Sustainability of the Fair Trade Movement: YUAB Case Study
2010
- 97Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage97
- Abstract Views85
- Downloads12
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This research questioned the sustainability of the Fair Trade movement. Using the historical progression of Fair Trade as an alternative trading scheme to its present day form as a niche in the mainstream market, this paper presented the subsequent challenges facing the movement: the entry of corporations, label credibility, consumer support and activism, expansion issues, and the north-south debate. Ultimately, this research argued that unless Fair Trade activists and organizations recognize these problems and make drastic efforts to address these challenges, the future success of the movement is at risk despite past successes. Using a new program – Youth United Across Borders (YUAB)- as a case study, this research revealed some of the ways new Fair Trade programs can positively contribute to addressing the challenges facing the Fair Trade movement through political participation, education, connection between producers and consumers, and developing relationships. A thorough critique of YUAB also examined some of its shortcomings that could be addressed to better contribute to the debate: education, state intervention, connection between producers and consumers, the credibility of the Fair Trade label, the lack of unified vision of Fair Trade, dependency and empowerment.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know