Bridging the Gap: Strategic Framing and Budget Advocacy in Tanzania
2010
- 177Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage177
- Abstract Views163
- Downloads14
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This research seeks to identify tools by which budget analysis and advocacy, specifically that of print media, can more effectively reach target audiences, particularly in contexts of high illiteracy and innumeracy. This has been done by evaluating a selection of budget advocacy materials produced by HakiElimu in Tanzania in 2009 and 2010 alongside certain core elements of the FrameWorks Institute’s Strategic Frame Analysis™. Additional contextual and evaluative inputs have been provided by key informants and a sample group. The findings suggest that strategic framing can assist budget advocacy in becoming more understandable, more appealing to target audiences, and more effective at inspiring citizens to take action. The research concludes that reframed, solution-oriented advocacy is contributory if not critical to raising Tanzania’s budget advocacy out of the crisis story and “blame frame” and into more productive modes of citizen-government social change.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know