Challenges of Adoptive (T-)cell Transfer Immunotherapy for Cancer
2016
- 332Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage332
- Downloads272
- Abstract Views60
Artifact Description
Background and significance: The rebirth of the theory of immunosurveillance in 2001 rejuvenated interest in anticancer immunotherapies. In particular, T-cell-based therapies have garnered substantial interest due to the robustness and tumor antigen-specific cytotoxicity of T-cell anticancer immune responses.Hypothesis: The efficacy of adoptive cell transfer (ACT) T-cell immunotherapy could significantly improve and gain widespread approval if future innovations in ACT-based approaches account for the pro- and antitumoral properties of non-CD8+ lineages of effector T-cells, evasion of T-cell antitumor immunity, and tumor-induced suppression of antitumor immunity.Problem Analysis: Despite numerous reports of highly successful ACT-based clinical trials, no such therapy is currently approved by the FDA for use in cancer patients. This project explores three limitations of current ACT-based anticancer therapies that may underline their lack of federal approval: inadequate incorporation of the pro- and antitumoral properties of non-CD8+ T-cell lineages as potential immunotherapeutic targets; tumor evasion of T-cell antitumor immunity; and tumor-induced immunosuppression of T-cells.Broader implications: Substantial patient-incurred economic costs are likely to be associated with ACT-based anticancer therapies if they are approved for clinical use. However, the relatively few side effects associated with anticancer ACT render this approach significantly less abusive than traditional forms of anticancer treatment.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know