Humbug Paper
2025
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Downloads6
- Abstract Views5
Artifact Description
This includes a letter to George H. Borts containing Shaikh's paper "The So-Called Transformation Problem" (5/11/73), a letter from Edward J. Nell with comments on Shaikh's paper (3/1/72), a letter to Review of Economics and Statistics with Shaikh's paper (5/30/72), a letter of receipt from Review of Economics and Statistics (6/1/72), a reply by Shaikh containing additional copies (6/5/72), a letter from a person at University of Bristol requesting a copy of the paper (11/13/72), a letter to Review of Economics and Statistics requesting a status update regarding his paper “Laws of Algebra and Laws of Production” (10/11/72), a letter to Review of Economics and Statistics containing revisions (10/30/72), a letter from Franklin M. Fisher with critical comments (11/8/72), a letter from a Professor of Economics at the University of Bristol with a comment (11/14/72), a letter to Review of Economics and Statistics requesting status update (2/22/73), a reply from Hendrik S. Houthakker that the paper will be published (3/8/73), a letter from Ian Steedman requesting a copy of the paper (3/14), a letter from a faculty member of the University of Calcutta requesting a copy (3/16/73), a letter from a student at Middlesex Polytechnic requesting a copy (3/30/73), a letter from Steedman thanking Shaikh and requesting a copy for his student (4/11/73), a letter from someone at University of Cambridge requesting a copy (6/30/73), a letter from Leoroy thanking Shaikh for the copy and enclosing another paper (10/3/73), a letter from Joan Robinson commenting that she felt he should have been given the opportunity to respond to Professor Solow who critiqued his paper (6/21/74), a letter from Luigi Passinetti commenting on the paper (6/7/74), a letter to Houthakker complaining that Shaikh was not able to reply to Solow's comment (6/28/74), a reply noting that Professor Shaikh’s paper was basically a critique of Professor Solow and that the case was now closed (7/1/74), a letter by G. C. Harcourt accepting Shaikh's paper in AEP and commenting on Houthakker's response (3/5/75), Harcourt expressing satisfaction at Shaikh's new paper (2/14/75), from Harcourt regarding publishing Shaik's paper in AEP (2/11/75), and Harcourt regarding publishing Shaikh's papers (8/13/74).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know