Are You a Criminal?: A Senior Project Examining the Relationship Between Stereotype and Power Using Signal Detection Analysis
2015
- 262Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage262
- Abstract Views248
- Downloads14
Artifact Description
Stereotype and power interact together every day in manners which previous research has substantiated holds some negative outcomes on others. The current project studies the mechanisms underlying stereotypic behavior and the way in which power manifests itself in stereotypic behaviors through Signal Detection Analysis. Participants were introduced to names of who they believed to be criminals and later were asked to identify the criminals from a list of names including non-criminals, following the False-Criminality Paradigm. The current study hypothesized that participants primed with power would exhibit more stereotypic behavior in judging individuals as criminal or not compared to a control condition; in addition researchers hypothesized that criterion bias would appear as the underlying mechanism of bias meaning that participants would shift the criteria needed to consider minorities as criminal compared to non-minorities. Participants did display more stereotypic behavior when primed with power, but this occurred as a result of decreased sensitivity, not criterion bias. This study offers some insight into the world of power and stereotype, highlighting sensitivity as an operating mechanism of stereotype, for which further research should be conducted. These results led to the need for this project to include several different intervention techniques as well that are used for reducing stereotype.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know