Insights into the design of SOFC infiltrated electrodes with optimized active TBP density via mechanistic modeling
Journal of the Electrochemical Society, ISSN: 1945-7111, Vol: 161, Issue: 12, Page: F1176-F1183
2014
- 22Citations
- 8Usage
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef10
- Usage8
- Abstract Views8
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
A mechanistic model for the prediction of total and active three phase boundary density (TPB), in combination with effective conductivity, of infiltrated solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrodes is presented. Varied porosities, scaffold:infiltrate size ratios, and pore:infiltrate size ratios were considered, each as a function of infiltrate loading. The results are presented in dimensionless form to allow for the calculation of any infiltrate particle size. The model output compares favorably to the available experimental result. The results show that the scaffold:infiltrate size ratio has the greatest impact on the TPB density, followed by the porosity and then the pore:infiltrate size ratio. The TPB density is shown to monotonically decrease with increasing scaffold:infiltrate and pore:infiltrate size ratios; however, it shows a maximum with respect to porosity. Each of these results are explained by examining the interfacial areas of each of the three phases as a function of the infiltrate loading. The model provides insight toward the rational design of infiltrated electrodes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84923374446&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0311412jes; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.0311412jes; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1149/2.0311412jes; https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/fac_journ/922; https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1958&context=fac_journ; https://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.0311412jes; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=e0f6f29d-e278-49e4-8f47-06b0236bb127&ssb=67049290483&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1149%2F2.0311412jes&ssi=debea73c-8427-45d1-8b94-2609c7917bcc&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=12168385553657698527653767614996457&ssn=cedcf421bda32624f3e9cc74ce8f7327f49517c5ab98-6cb9-4002-97e176&sso=2f0fd673-5afc0bb05247748b2cfa88db7ac868c984613ce51b9c0f82&ssp=26405156301718027477171840063675432&ssq=42763378481223546076599480455071181208938&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMDM5MTI3NDctNTcxYy00YTExLWI1M2UtNGFjZjQ3MDljNmNiNS0xNzE4MDk5NDgwNzkxMzg1MzMxNjY2LTNmYzc2OGYzYWJkMDY4NTY1Mjc1NiIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDBkMzMxYzhhLWI4MzctNDgzMS1iOGM3LTUwZWY4YTZhMDIyMzE3MTgwOTk0ODA3OTEzODUzMzE2NjYtMDZiOGRlNDU3OTMyMmRlNTUyNzU2IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
The Electrochemical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know