Improved geometry modeling for high fidelity parametric design
48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Page: 1-12
2010
- 18Citations
- 410Usage
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef10
- Usage410
- Downloads369
- Abstract Views41
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Conference Paper Description
Advanced multidisciplinary physics-based design and analysis capabilities are required to pursue the revolutionary vehicle and technology concepts needed to meet the goals of the aerospace industry for the next 10-30 years. The multidisciplinary physics critical to advancing aerospace technology all have one common bond, the shape, size, and form of the underlying aircraft - its geometry. An aircraft shape is the natural starting point for multidisciplinary analysis and optimization (MDAO). Vehicle Sketch Pad (VSP) is an aircraft geometry tool for rapid evaluation of advanced design concepts which was developed by NASA and is available to industry at large. VSP allows designers to express their design in terms of engineering parameters. The results of design choices are presented in real-time to the designer. In this research, VSP has been extended in two major ways to improve the designer's ability to include high fidelity geometry based analysis in the design process. The first major improvement was the addition of a new high-quality surface meshing capability for VSP. The second major improvement was the addition of intuitive parametric representations of internal structure for VSP including the ability to convey that representation to appropriate structural modeling tools. Copyright © 2010 by James R. Gloudemans.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78649900400&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-659; https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2010-659; http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2010-659; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/aero_fac/106; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1104&context=aero_fac
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know