Heavy Metals in Seaweeds from a Polluted Estuary in Coastal Maine
Rhodora, ISSN: 0035-4902, Vol: 119, Issue: 979, Page: 201-211
2017
- 10Citations
- 249Usage
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef2
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage249
- Downloads246
- Abstract Views3
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Seaweeds (macroalgae) accumulate heavy metals from seawater and can therefore serve as biological monitors of marine pollution. In this paper, we present data on the tissue chemistry of seaweeds from the area of Callahan Mine, an intertidal copper and zinc mine in Brooksville, ME, USA, abandoned in the 1970s and now designated as a Superfund site. The mine is located on the Goose Pond estuary, which drains into the ocean via a tidal waterfall at Goose Falls. Seaweed tissue samples from this estuary had the same relative concentrations of metals as had been reported previously in water samples from this location, with Zn > Cu > Pb > Cd. Ascophyllum nodosum, the most common macroalgal species in the area, had comparatively high levels of all four metals in samples from Goose Pond itself, while samples from Goose Falls tended to have substantially lower metal concentrations statistically indistinguishable from samples collected in nearby unpolluted sites. At Goose Falls, where seaweed diversity was highest, Fucus distichus subsp. evanescens tended to accumulate the highest levels of Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd. We discuss the implications of these results for the Callahan Mine environment and, more generally, for using seaweeds as biological monitors of metal pollution in coastal Maine. In an online appendix, we also provide historical and modern floristic data on the seaweeds of the Callahan Mine. The floristic and tissue chemistry data are baseline information which may be useful for the future assessment and remediation of the mine.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041963073&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3119/16-25; http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.3119/16-25; http://www.bioone.org/doi/full-xml/10.3119/16-25; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/bio_fac/486; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1491&context=bio_fac
New England Botanical Club
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know