The lick AGN monitoring project 2011: Dynamical modeling of the broad-line region in Mrk 50
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 754, Issue: 1, Page: 1-8
2012
- 80Citations
- 229Usage
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations80
- Citation Indexes80
- 80
- CrossRef68
- Usage229
- Downloads221
- Abstract Views8
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
We present dynamical modeling of the broad-line region (BLR) in the Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 50 using reverberation mapping data taken as part of the Lick AGN Monitoring Project (LAMP) 2011. We model the reverberation mapping data directly, constraining the geometry and kinematics of the BLR, as well as deriving a black hole mass estimate that does not depend on a normalizing factor or virial coefficient. We find that the geometry of the BLR in Mrk 50 is a nearly face-on thick disk, with a mean radius of 9.6 light days, a width of the BLR of 6.9 light days, and a disk opening angle of 25 ± 10 deg above the plane. We also constrain the inclination angle to be 9 deg, close to face-on. Finally, the black hole mass of Mrk 50 is inferred to be log(M /M = 7.57. By comparison to the virial black hole mass estimate from traditional reverberation mapping analysis, we find the normalizing constant (virial coefficient) to be log f = 0.78, consistent with the commonly adopted mean value of 0.74 based on aligning the M -σ* relation for active galactic nuclei and quiescent galaxies. While our dynamical model includes the possibility of a net inflow or outflow in the BLR, we cannot distinguish between these two scenarios. © 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84863676526&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/754/1/49; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/754/i=1/a=49?key=crossref.dc67f078a3667dba2feba266acfb1187; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/49; http://stacks.iop.org/0004-637X/754/i=1/a=49/pdf; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/phy_fac/388; https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1392&context=phy_fac; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/49; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/49; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=6991cede-058a-43a7-b626-ab56af25af23&ssb=42206286003&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F0004-637X%2F754%2F1%2F49&ssi=892a0adc-8427-43d2-9580-f122c2bf32d2&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=56251742061271822135138522328351787&ssn=7ece9d746206eba3fe19f7798dcf7917824017c5ab98-6cb9-4002-9e28ca&sso=893e5673-5afc0bb05247489772f7f22e26b60850b38d95a3fee6592a&ssp=48157730181718048846171823745757469&ssq=54263001346318179952899480181402332831219&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMDM5MTI3NDctNTcxYy00YTExLWI1M2UtNGFjZjQ3MDljNmNiMi0xNzE4MDk5NDgwNzkxMTEzOTgyNTg4LTQzMWRiOTY1NDIzMjczODgxMzUxMyIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDBkMzMxYzhhLWI4MzctNDgzMS1iOGM3LTUwZWY4YTZhMDIyMzE3MTgwOTk0ODA3OTExMTM5ODI1ODgtY2YyNTMwMTI3MjUwMDI5MjEzNTEzIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know