Interpreting [e]: The Reformulation of a Gricean Framework in Understanding Null Categories in Mandarin Chinese
2017
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Article Description
Previous syntactic approaches to account for null arguments in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth, MC) have assumed certain pragmatic factors. The main goal of this paper is two-fold: to provide an overview of the syntactic literature of null arguments in MC, and to illustrate Grice's Maxims as a way of showing how pragmatic features might contribute to the meaning of null arguments. This paper will agree with the broad notion that pragmatic factors are critical to any effort to account for null arguments in MC. By considering subject and object pronouns in MC, however, I will argue that previous studies have not specified the pragmatic factors relevant to accounting for null arguments in MC. I will show how Grice's Maxims shed light on the pragmatics that previous syntactic approaches have assumed and suggest that an adequate pragmatic explanation of null pronouns in MC requires an acknowledgment of the blending between pragmatics (including Grice's Maxims) and syntax.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know