Gestalt Processing in Autistic Adolescents
2012
- 13Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage13
- Abstract Views13
Article Description
Previous research has documented that individuals with autism preferentially attend to local rather than global elements of a visual scene. We tested another pre-attentive phenomenon - gestalt processing - to investigate whether the global processing deficits seen in autism extend to gestalt processing. We asked 5 individuals with low functioning autism and 13 typically developing individuals to point to the odd item in a four-item display to test ability and speed in using gestalt principles of proximity, similarity and closure. As expected, the control group was significantly faster at responding to gestalt-grouped targets than targets differing in only a single feature. However, individuals with autism did not show a significant difference in reaction time between conditions, implying that parsing gestalt relationships is as taxing as processing single features. Both groups were generally more accurate in the gestalt condition. Taken together, these findings suggest that although the ability to process gestalt relationships appears to be intact in autism, gestalt processing may not be a pre-attentive process for this sample. Implications and future directions are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know