Countless Ramayanas: Language and Cosmopolitan Belonging in a South Asian Epic
2013
- 12Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage12
- Abstract Views12
Article Description
In November 2011, A.K. Ramanujan's essay on the Ramayana, a South Asian epic, was removed from Delhi University' undergraduate history syllabus. Hindu nationalist student groups deemed the Ramayana stories in Ramanujan's essay as offensive towards the Hindu gods, and pressured the university's administration. However, how does the Ramayana, a continuously growing corpus of stories, belong to just Hindus, or any other group? How do such narratives become socially contested and debated? As a response to the Hindu nationalist treatment of the Ramayana as a singular, master narrative, the Kiski Kahani project, a not-for-profit program in Pune, India, compiles and rewrites fragments of Ramayana stories in print publications, theatre workshops, and web pages. Through this practice, Kiski Kahani's writers and performers, who are young, multi-ethnic, and multi-religious, articulate their opinions about the Ramayana debate and their itinerant life histories by retelling the epics as plural and inclusive. Drawing from participant observation and textual analysis, I examine how Kiski Kahani employs language modalities that index a sense of belonging to a cosmopolitan nation: using English rather than Hindi or Marathi, curating stories from diverse Indian ethnolinguistic regions, and reclaiming Ramayana stories as a socially situated, emerging genre. I offer a way of looking into texts not only as an imprint of macro-political ideologies, but also as a social commentary on language and life histories in urban India and beyond.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know