On the Development of Implicit Racial Bias: Measurement Variation and Empirical Inconsistencies
2021
- 9Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
Article Description
Intergroup racial bias refers generally to the systematic tendency to evaluate one racial group more favorably than another (Hewstone, Rubin,& Willis, 2002). Despite a steep decline in explicitly expressed racial bias over the last several decades (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000), people continue to hold negative attitudes toward racial minorities at an implicit level (Dovidio, 2001), and produce discriminatory acts in a more subtle form (Omi & Winant 1994). In the view of this problem, developmental researchers set out to investigate the origins and development of implicit racial bias, seeking to understand how children’s racial attitudes link with those observed in adults. The current developmental literature demonstrates variation in measurement strategies for implicit racial bias, and evidence for the construct validity of these child-friendly implicit measures is inadequate. The existing literature is also mixed as to whether or not implicit racial bias is developmentally invariant. This paper reviews four types of implicit racial bias measures that have been commonly used in the child population, catalogues their methodological differences, assesses their convergent and discriminant validities, and analyzes contradictory findings in studies using these measures.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know