We May Disagree, but We All Love the BJP: Populists' Targeting Strategies on Twitter
2021
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Article Description
With the rise of social media, politicians have been faced with both new challenges and opportunities in partitioning and presenting their message online. Populists have especially capitalized on the reach and absence of traditional gatekeepers on social media to achieve wide electoral success. Through analyzing the structure of the BJP network and the primary frames used in different clusters within the network, this paper seeks to determine whether populists target siloed constituencies with tailored messages or coalesce distinct constituencies through vague rhetoric that can appeal to the greatest common factor. The results suggest that the ruling party in India has primarily used microtargeting to cultivate siloed neighborhoods within its network of supporters. This practice is damaging for democracy because it reduces opportunities for debate in the public square and breeds an environment of misconceptions and pedaled falsehoods.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know