Forecasting the U.S. Unemployment Rate: The Impact of Stock Market Volatility
2011
- 1Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
Article Description
This paper presents a comparison of forecasting performance for a variety of linear time series models using the U.S. unemployment rate. The main emphasis is on measuring forecast performance in bi-variate vector auto-regressive models that include either a measure of stock market uncertainty, industrial production, or capacity utilization and the U.S. unemployment rate. Accounting for a regime shift in monetary policy in the late 1970s and isolating measures of macroeconomic well being in different bivariate vector autoregressive models allows for commonsensical comparisons between models that should intuitively improve forecasts over existing linear methods. Comparisons are also made with the consensus median forecasts from the Survey of Professional Forecasters. The results indicate that models incorporating a measure of stock market volatility improved the accuracy of the forecasts over other bivariate and univariate linear models.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know