Policing Privilege and Disciplining Bodies: Victoria C. Woodhull, Anthony Comstock, and the Platform for Social Engineering
Vol: 5, Issue: 1
2018
- 1,254Usage
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,254
- Downloads1,161
- 1,161
- Abstract Views93
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
Biden administration threatens free speech with Title IX gender identity rule
American campuses, which should be havens for free speech, have become infested with puritanical zealotry that does not abide dissent, especially on controversial topics such
Article Description
Anthony Comstock and Victoria C. Woodhull were both important ideological figures in the tumultuous time of the Gilded Age. Infamous for her campaign for the presidency of the United States in 1872, Woodhull is often lauded as one of the earliest and most radical feminists. Comstock, on the other hand, would build his legacy out of his devotion to strict Victorian ideals, enacting countless censorship laws to impede the flow of obscene materials. While Comstock and Woodhull could not seem more polar in their political and social beliefs, this paper explores an important ideological similarity that they shared. This similarity is analyzed through a Foucaultian framework and probed through the lens of the Gilded Age. This paper seeks to explore this ideological relationship as it relates to Gilded Age and contemporary perpetuations of white, upper class, able-bodied privilege while illuminating the impact these two mammoth figures had on social historic discourse.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know