An Analysis Of California's Failed Electricity Deregulation
2003
- 9Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
Thesis / Dissertation Description
In the mid to late 1990’s, California undertook a deregulation of its electricity markets, seeking to disintegrate the former monopoly utility firm system. Historical factors and politics led to a deregulation plan that included a transition period for the recuperation of “stranded costs” by monopoly utility firms, during which the price of retail electricity was fixed while the price of wholesale electricity was allowed to fluctuate. Despite later allegations of the exercise of market power in the wholesale electricity market, I will show that exogenous factors such as weather, demographics, and the innate price volatility of a commodity that cannot be effectively stored were alone enough to bring down this poorly designed plan during its transition period. I examine here the historic, political, and economic reasons for the failure of California’s electricity deregulation plan.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know