Practical methods of health behavior change: A discussion of two interventional studies
2018
- 121Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage121
- Downloads82
- Abstract Views39
Lecture / Presentation Description
Programs designed to improve health outcomes do not always result in meaningful positive behavior change. Their efficacy may be limited by clinical resources and variation in motivation and learning style between patients. This presentation compares two studies: one aimed at improving the average daily step count of faculty and staff at the College of Saint Benedict through text message or social media encouragement, and one aimed at improving the bone health of female students through an online video or one-on-one provider-patient intervention. Both studies provide interesting comparisons of health interventions across different age groups, and between education versus motivation based behavior change. Both studies address the importance of applying research to the clinical setting. In the faculty/staff population, despite the absence of significant behavior change, 70.4 percent of participants who completed the post intervention survey reported text message and social media encouragement helped them be more active. Participants identified accountability as the main motivator for behavior change. Technology based health interventions may be important in making desirable health outcomes more accessible to patients and reduce the burden on health professionals. No gains in student learning in the education based intervention led to corresponding changes in behaviors. This provides some insights into the discordance between knowledge and behavior in college students, indicating a motivation instead of education based intervention may be more effective in this population. When considered together, the results of these two studies provide important insights for future research towards accessible behavior change.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know