Internal Controls and Integration Lead to an Ethical, Effective, and Efficient Purchasing System
2012
- 46Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage46
- Abstract Views46
Interview Description
The University of Washington is the state of Washington largest university and third largest employer, behind Boeing and Microsoft. Purchasing is performed using hybrid system, made up of a central purchasing department that oversees many sub-buying units assigned to individual departments. Facilities Services is responsible for maintaining the operation and maintenance of the campus. They have a Finance and Business unit that is responsible for all procurement needs for the department. The department also includes “stores”, a warehouse location of MRO supplies. Problem The university’s has established an e-procurement system; within in it offers a vast number of suppliers and e-catalogs. It is an on-going challenge for the purchasing to control what is being purchased and through what means it is being purchased. Customers continue to seek out suppliers and look for loopholes in policies that allow them to conduct business in their own self-interest, conflicting with university policies. For example: • Personnel issuing multiple purchase orders to equal to amount of a single purchase to bypass the RFQ process. • Low-level employees able to request material purchases without any department approval. • Supplier selection based on personal relationships Objective We will focus our research on Facilities Services Finance and Business unit and how they are governed by Central Purchasing. Also, research more in-depth the issues and recommend solutions to help them achieve greater value and efficiencies by integration.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know