Using GIS to Assess the Post-Fire Table Mountain Environment for Mass Wasting Susceptibility
2013
- 16Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage16
- Abstract Views16
Interview Description
The Table Mountain fire of Central Washington started on September 8, 2012 during a significant lightning storm. The burned area totaled 42,312 acres. Wildfires can form hydrophobic soils, remove duff, and remove stabilizing vegetation from slopes resulting in a decrease in slope stability and an increase in mass wasting susceptibility. The recent and inaccessible nature of the Table Mountain fire has resulted in few studies being conducted on the post-fire environment. My goal was to model how the Table Mountain fire could affect slope stability of burned areas, hence mass wasting susceptibility at Table Mountain. Data was formatted and analyzed in ArcMap 10.1, creating a relative hazard map that encompassed all significant factors potentially influencing mass wasting in the area such as soil burn severity, topography, aspect, geology, vegetation cover, and hydrology. Each parameter was assigned a relative hazard ranking representing their importance in assessing mass wasting hazards. Preliminary results show that DEM’s were useful in providing slope and aspect analysis, and that the use of Landsat 7 imagery was sufficient to show percent vegetation cover. Areas with the greatest landslide susceptibility were near streams in areas with high intensity burning, presence of landslide deposits, and have a slope greater than 35 degrees. Most of the burned area was ranked as moderate mass wasting susceptibility followed by areas of low and high mass wasting susceptibility, respectively, the abundance of basalt bedrock and areas of low slope in the study area may account for the large areas of moderate mass wasting susceptibility.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know