Carbon Fiber External Hiking Pack Frame
2014
- 46Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage46
- Abstract Views46
Interview Description
The purpose of this project was to design and manufacture a carbon fiber pack frame that was at least 50 percent lighter than the original aluminum frame, was compatible with the existing hardware, and would stand on its own at a maximum load of 55 pounds. When it comes to hiking, the less weight you have to carry around, the easier and more enjoyable your adventure will be. Cutting down on initial weight of the carrying devise seemed like the most appropriate place to start. The first step was to determine what material would be most effective in achieving the desired results and be both feasible and cost effective for the scope of the project. The next step was to design and draw the new frame and all of its components and all of the necessary mounting locations for the existing cloth portion of the backpack and the addition of feet to make it stand. This was done on the CAD program, Solidworks, in a university computer lab. Next, analysis of the design and material was done to ensure failure would not occur under static and dynamic situations which the frame would be subject to. Lastly, the tubes that make up the framework were manufactured in a university lab, using wet-layup with a standard weave carbon fiber fabric and two part epoxy resin. Parts were cut to size and assembled with a high strength epoxy. The results will be measured against the frame’s abilities to conform to the criteria constraining the project.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know