Assessing Earthquake Preparedness in Southern Ellensburg
2015
- 21Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage21
- Abstract Views21
Interview Description
Because Ellensburg is situated in an area of moderate seismic risk, it is critical that the community is made aware of risks they face and utilize existing mitigation plans and strategies to best prepare themselves for a seismic event. As a class, we studied the earthquake hazard in Ellensburg, and assessed the degree to which the community and economy are vulnerable to a seismic hazard. We conducted a city-wide survey to ask the community about their earthquake knowledge and preparedness. Our sub-group was assigned to research the southern region of Ellensburg, covering between Water Street and Chestnut Street, and Capitol Avenue and East Umptanum Road. Using existing resources from the Kittitas County Planning Office, we extrapolated the county’s susceptibility data to our southern region of Ellensburg. We studied the liquefaction susceptibility of the soil in our region. Using these data, residential and commercial facilities were examined using Federal Emergency Management Agency rapid visual screening protocol. We found that residential buildings tended to score higher than commercial buildings. In addition, critical facilities in our region such as Lincoln Elementary and Kittitas Valley Community Hospital were asked about their existing earthquake plans. Based on any existing mitigation strategies these facilities had in place, as well as our own findings, we made recommendations on how to better prepare these facilities for a seismic event. These included expanding education efforts, as well as providing emergency kits to stakeholders.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know