Developing a morphometric protocol for identifying and analyzing morphological variability in stone tools
2021
- 17Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage17
- Abstract Views17
Poster Description
Morphometrics analysis of stone tools emphasizes the use of metric data to capture information about tool attributes, such as shape. These techniques are still under development, with some adapted for less reduced tools and others making use of prohibitively expensive technology. This project developed a morphometric analysis technique that is more accessible and attuned to more reduced tools. The artifacts used come from a teaching collection of 18 projectile points from the mid-Columbia River Valley in Kittitas County, Washington. We compare a novel technique to two pre-existing approaches. Our research objective is to identify morphological attributes whose presence, frequency, and distribution are shaped by natural selection in contrast to those traits influenced by cultural transmission. The comparative methods fell short of identifying shape trends but some data suggested there are greater differences in variation around the haft elements than those of the blade and point. The novel method indicated blade shape was a functional element influenced by natural selection and hafting was a stylistic trait influenced by cultural selection.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know