Nonparametric sparsification of complex multiscale networks
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 6, Issue: 2, Page: e16431
2011
- 78Citations
- 2Usage
- 86Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations78
- Citation Indexes78
- 78
- CrossRef28
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures86
- Readers86
- 86
Article Description
Many real-world networks tend to be very dense. Particular examples of interest arise in the construction of networks that represent pairwise similarities between objects. In these cases, the networks under consideration are weighted, generally with positive weights between any two nodes. Visualization and analysis of such networks, especially when the number of nodes is large, can pose significant challenges which are often met by reducing the edge set. Any effective "sparsification" must retain and reflect the important structure in the network. A common method is to simply apply a hard threshold, keeping only those edges whose weight exceeds some predetermined value. A more principled approach is to extract the multiscale "backbone" of a network by retaining statistically significant edges through hypothesis testing on a specific null model, or by appropriately transforming the original weight matrix before applying some sort of threshold. Unfortunately, approaches such as these can fail to capture multiscale structure in which there can be small but locally statistically significant similarity between nodes. In this paper, we introduce a new method for backbone extraction that does not rely on any particular null model, but instead uses the empirical distribution of similarity weight to determine and then retain statistically significant edges. We show that our method adapts to the heterogeneity of local edge weight distributions in several paradigmatic real world networks, and in doing so retains their multiscale structure with relatively insignificant additional computational costs. We anticipate that this simple approach will be of great use in the analysis of massive, highly connected weighted networks. © 2011 Foti et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g006
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79951573888&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21346815; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/115; https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1114&context=facoa; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0016431; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g003; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0016431&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016431.g002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know