Familiarity facilitates feature-based face processing
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 12, Issue: 6, Page: e0178895
2017
- 19Citations
- 5Usage
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- CrossRef19
- 18
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Recognition of personally familiar faces is remarkably efficient, effortless and robust. We asked if feature-based face processing facilitates detection of familiar faces by testing the effect of face inversion on a visual search task for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Because face inversion disrupts configural and holistic face processing, we hypothesized that inversion would diminish the familiarity advantage to the extent that it is mediated by such processing. Subjects detected personally familiar and stranger target faces in arrays of two, four, or six face images. Subjects showed significant facilitation of personally familiar face detection for both upright and inverted faces. The effect of familiarity on target absent trials, which involved only rejection of unfamiliar face distractors, suggests that familiarity facilitates rejection of unfamiliar distractors as well as detection of familiar targets. The preserved familiarity effect for inverted faces suggests that facilitation of face detection afforded by familiarity reflects mostly feature-based processes.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; 10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020418252&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582439; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003; https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/207; https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1208&context=facoa; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0178895; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178895.g004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know