Interface strategies in monolingual and end-state L2 Spanish grammars are not that different
Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN: 1664-1078, Vol: 5, Issue: OCT, Page: 1525
2014
- 11Citations
- 117Usage
- 42Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef8
- Usage117
- Downloads105
- Abstract Views12
- Captures42
- Readers42
- 42
Article Description
This study explores syntactic, pragmatic, and lexical influences on adherence to SV and VS orders in native and fluent L2 speakers of Spanish. A judgment task examined 20 native monolingual and 20 longstanding L2 bilingual Spanish speakers' acceptance of SV and VS structures. Seventy-six distinct verbs were tested under a combination of syntactic and pragmatic constraints. Our findings challenge the hypothesis that internal interfaces are acquired more easily than external interfaces (Sorace, 2005, 2011; Sorace and Filiaci, 2006; White, 2006). Additional findings are that (a) bilinguals' judgments are less firm overall than monolinguals' (i.e., monolinguals are more likely to give extreme "yes" or "no" judgments) and (b) individual verbs do not necessarily behave as predicted under standard definitions of unaccusatives and unergatives. Correlations of the patterns found in the data with verb frequencies suggest that usage-based accounts of grammatical knowledge could help provide insight into speakers' knowledge of these constructs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84926624138&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628580; http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525/abstract; https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/english_fac/1; https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=english_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525/full; http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01525/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know