Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
2020
- 622Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage622
- Downloads580
- Abstract Views42
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Geographic data are information associated with a location on the surface of the Earth. They comprise spatial attributes (latitude, longitude, and altitude) and non-spatial attributes (facts related to a location). Traditionally, Physical Geography datasets were considered to be more valuable, thus attracted most research interest. But with the advancements in remote sensing technologies and widespread use of GPS enabled cellphones and IoT (Internet of Things) devices, recent years witnessed explosive growth in the amount of available Human Geography datasets. However, methods and tools that are capable of analyzing and modeling these datasets are very limited. This is because Human Geography data are inherently difficult to model due to its characteristics (non-stationarity, uneven distribution, etc.).Many algorithms were invented to solve these challenges -- especially non-stationarity -- in the past few years, like Geographically Weighted Regression, Multiscale GWR, Geographical Random Forest, etc. They were proven to be much more efficient than the general machine learning algorithms that are not specifically designed to deal with non-stationarity. However, such algorithms are far from perfect and have a lot of room for improvement.This dissertation proposed multiple algorithms for modeling non-stationary geographic data. The main contributions are: (1) designed a novel method to evaluate non-stationarity and its impact on regression models; (2) proposed the Geographic R-Partition tree for modeling non-stationary data; (3) proposed the IDW-RF algorithm, which uses the advantages of Random Forests to deal with extremely unevenly distributed geographic datasets; (4) proposed the LVRF algorithm, which models geographic data using a latent variable based method. Experiments show that these algorithms are very efficient and outperform other state-of-the-art algorithms in certain scenarios.
Bibliographic Details
Florida International University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know