Expressing Regret, Calm, or Pride: Leader Low-arousal Emotional Expressions' Effects on Leadership Perceptions
2023
- 15Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage15
- Downloads8
- Abstract Views7
Artifact Description
A main part of a leader’s role involves navigating challenging situations such as less-than-ideal outcomes, decision-making failures, or a difficult market. In these high-pressure moments, leaders may respond with a sense of calm, express their regrets in a natural way, or intentionally demonstrate their pride. Ultimately, the emotion a leader expresses can considerably affect how people perceive their leadership. However, research on these common leaders’ low-arousal emotions has by and large been ignored. Through three studies, this dissertation draws on and extends the implicit theory of leadership emotions (ITLEs) to examine, how low-arousal emotional expressions (i.e., regret, calm, and pride) impact observers’ evaluations of the leaders’ effectiveness (i.e., leader effectiveness, competence, power, confidence) and value-based attributes (i.e., leader sincerity, integrity, humility). In addition, the underlying mechanism - perceived leader prototype violation was investigated. Integrating with the literature on leader gender and leader attributes, this study also examines the moderating role of leader gender and leader attributes in altering the impacts of low-arousal emotional expressions on perceived leader effectiveness. Results support that negative low-arousal emotion expression – regret, could harm perceived leader effectiveness and the effects are mediated by the leader prototype violation, while positive low-arousal emotion expression – pride and calm, could bring positive effects on perceived leader effectiveness. Results also indicate that the impact of these emotions on the perceived leader attributes is limited, in that leader’s pride expression would decrease the perceived leader humility. Regarding the moderating factors, this study found that leader integrity and humility have a moderating effect on leader effectiveness and competence. Future study on gender’s moderating role is encouraged.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know