Relations between morphology, buoyancy and energetics of requiem sharks
Royal Society Open Science, ISSN: 2054-5703, Vol: 3, Issue: 10, Page: 160406
2016
- 41Citations
- 122Usage
- 60Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations41
- Citation Indexes41
- 41
- CrossRef28
- Usage122
- Downloads117
- Abstract Views5
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
- Mentions2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Article Description
Sharks have a distinctive shape that remained practically unchanged through hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Nonetheless, there are variations of this shape that vary between and within species. We attempt to explain these variations by examining the partial derivatives of the cost of transport of a generic shark with respect to buoyancy, span and chord of its pectoral fins, length, girth and body temperature. Our analysis predicts an intricate relation between these parameters, suggesting that ectothermic species residing in cooler temperatures must either have longer pectoral fins and/or be more buoyant in order to maintain swimming performance. It also suggests that, in general, the buoyancy must increase with size, and therefore, there must be ontogenetic changes within a species, with individuals getting more buoyant as they grow. Pelagic species seem to have near optimally sized fins (which minimize the cost of transport), but the majority of reef sharks could have reduced the cost of transport by increasing the size of their fins. The fact that they do not implies negative selection, probably owing to decreased manoeuvrability in confined spaces (e.g. foraging on a reef).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84993995157&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160406; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853556; https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.160406; https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/merc_fac/11; https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=merc_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160406; http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/10/160406; http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/10/160406.abstract; http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/3/10/160406.full.pdf; http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rsos.160406
The Royal Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know