ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
Frontiers in Neuroscience, ISSN: 1662-453X, Vol: 7, Issue: 7 DEC, Page: 237
2013
- 85Citations
- 123Usage
- 179Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations85
- Citation Indexes85
- 85
- CrossRef29
- Usage123
- Downloads119
- Abstract Views4
- Captures179
- Readers179
- 179
Article Description
Independent component analysis (ICA) has become a widely used method for extracting functional networks in the brain during rest and task. Historically, preferred ICA dimensionality has widely varied within the neuroimaging community, but typically varies between 20 and 100 components. This can be problematic when comparing results across multiple studies because of the impact ICA dimensionality has on the topology of its resultant components. Recent studies have demonstrated that ICA can be applied to peak activation coordinates archived in a large neuroimaging database (i.e., BrainMap Database) to yield whole-brain task-based co-activation networks. A strength of applying ICA to BrainMap data is that the vast amount of metadata in BrainMap can be used to quantitatively assess tasks and cognitive processes contributing to each component. In this study, we investigated the effect of model order on the distribution of functional properties across networks as a method for identifying the most informative decompositions of BrainMap-based ICA components. Our findings suggest dimensionality of 20 for low model order ICA to examine large-scale brain networks, and dimensionality of 70 to provide insight into how large-scale networks fractionate into sub-networks. We also provide a functional and organizational assessment of visual, motor, emotion, and interoceptive task co-activation networks as they fractionate from low to high model-orders. © 2013 Ray, McKay, Fox, Riedel, Uecker, Beckmann, Smith, Fox and Laird.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898020259&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24339802; http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237/abstract; https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/physics_fac/60; https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=physics_fac; https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237; https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237/full; http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237/full; https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237/full
Frontiers Media SA
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know