Teacher Perceptions of the Impact of the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process on Teacher Effectiveness, Professional Growth, and Attitudes Toward Teaching
2016
- 595Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage595
- Downloads508
- Abstract Views87
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study’s purpose was to examine teacher perceptions of the impact the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process (NCTEP) has on their professional growth, effectiveness, and attitudes toward teaching. Literature review reveals a longstanding interest in teacher evaluation for ensuring teacher quality and enhancing professional growth. Controversy exists in public and educational arenas as to how both purposes can be accomplished within a single evaluation system.North Carolina evaluation reforms have mirrored nationwide efforts to use teacher evaluation as a tool for improving teacher effectiveness. The incorporation of value-added measures (VAMs) into teachers’ summative ratings and implementation of the North Carolina Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) for online data collection were outcomes of North Carolina’s Race to the Top grant.In this study, teachers from a midsized school district in western North Carolina completed the Teacher Evaluation Profile (modified). This online survey identified correlations among key evaluation attributes and outcome ratings for overall quality of NCTEP, its impact on attitudes toward teaching, professional growth, and teacher effectiveness. Narrative responses were generated through survey comments and follow-up interviews.Findings from this study supported the conclusions that teacher perceptions of the impact of NCTEP on professional growth, teacher effectiveness, and attitudes toward teaching differed based on years of teaching experience and grade level taught at the time of the last evaluation. Teacher attributes did not show significant relationships to outcome ratings.Qualitative data indicated that teachers perceive that NCTEP does not include all aspects contributing to teacher performance. Teachers report that student factors such as motivation, attendance, behavior, and intellectual qualities should be taken into consideration in NCTEP.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know