Teacher Preparation Programs and Motivation Strategies for Student Achievement in Select Elementary Schools
2018
- 289Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage289
- Downloads248
- Abstract Views41
Thesis / Dissertation Description
According to Ashton (1984), teacher self-efficacy can produce a prevailing paradigm in the field of education. Ashton stated that there is no other personality trait of teachers that has such a profound effect on student academic success. A teacher preparation program that has an aim of developing teacher self-efficacy and includes the important elements of motivating students, “should develop teachers who possess the motivation essential for effective classroom performance” (Ashton, 1984, p. 2). Teacher self-efficacy denotes the belief or discernment that one can perform tasks adequately to reach a desired goal (Bandura, 1997).According to Bandura (1986), self-efficacy judgments are based on four sources of information: an individual’s own past performance, vicarious experiences of observing the performances of others, verbal persuasion that one possesses certain capabilities, and physiological states (Bandura, 1986). These four sources play a pivotal role in teacher efficacy and their beliefs about children (Usher & Pajares, 2008).In recent years, many educators have written about the purposes and desired outcomes of educational psychology, sensing the significance of the psychology field and its effect on teaching and learning (Brophy, 1974; Woolfolk Hoy, 2000). Nevertheless, educational psychologists have had difficulty explicating what their field requires and the impact it has on education (Ashton, 1984).The goal of this research was twofold: to discuss the level of teacher training in college programs that pertain to teacher understanding of student motivational theories and to examine how teacher motivational strategies impact student achievement. To collect the data to answer these questions, a Motivating Students Questionnaire (MSQ) was sent to all certified teachers in four different elementary schools. Once the surveys were collected, they were analyzed individually to find a correlation of which motivational strategies worked best with students in the classroom. In addition, the researcher interviewed beginning teachers with 1-4 years of teaching experience at the participating schools to gauge their points of view on best practices when motivating their own students. The interviews were completely anonymous, with the researcher only recording the grade levels and subject areas of the interviewees.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know