Retaining the Essential During the Great Resignation: Intentional Practices in Improving Employee Engagement Within the Division of Student Affairs
2022
- 354Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage354
- Downloads191
- Abstract Views163
Project Description
The COVID-19 pandemic stirred up trends in the higher education industry that impacted many student affairs employees to the point that many had chosen to retire early or transition to another type of industry for employment. This exodus of employees turned into what is now called the Great Resignation. Organizations benefit from employees having pride in what they do, but what happens when they start to feel undervalued or disposable? Employee engagement is a substantial factor that affects workplace retention. Many student affairs employees have either changed their career paths or retired early in the past few years due to the excessive use of “other duties as assigned" to balance employee gaps within various departments or unclear practices brought on by the pandemic. Having those shared experiences of seeing coworkers reluctant to return to work or change labor markets altogether awakened dialogues about the importance of employees' physiological, mental, spiritual, and financial health. This project seeks to understand how higher education leaders can intentionally utilize employee engagement principles and strategies within the student affairs division in higher education. The goal is to analyze employee engagement within student affairs and determine what theories, techniques, and resources are necessary to maintain a caring culture as an equitable practice that will increase employee engagement and satisfaction. The research for this review topic is based on the Great Resignation and intentional workplace principles that can positively impact employee engagement within student affairs.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know