Literacy Coaching: A Research Based Coaching Guide
2017
- 1,060Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,060
- Downloads797
- Abstract Views263
Artifact Description
The question that guided the work of the researcher was: What impact would a research based coaching guide have on a coach’s effectiveness with teachers, understanding that the end goal of coaching is increased student achievement? Research suggested that professional learning via coaching is key to building capacity in teachers. However, the researcher found that the role of the literacy coach in many schools is one with little or no initial training or a core resource from which to anchor a coach’s work with teachers. Research clearly suggested that the instructional coach role lacks effectiveness if the coach does not have training, support, and resources. The researcher drew the following conclusions: Literacy coaching has the potential to positively impact student learning if, and only if, it is done well. Authentic coaching conversations must occur and should include the observation/feedback cycle. Research/theory based literacy coaching strategies provide a base for highly effective and differentiated coaching. Measuring the effectiveness of coaching as seen evidenced in change in teachers’ practice is essential to the process. In response to the research and personal experience, the author created a research based coaching guide that provides a synthesis of the research including recommendations, resources, and reference material. The guide includes resources for planning for coaching, coaching best practices, differentiated coaching resources, and ideas for measuring coaching effectiveness.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know