The Advantages of Existing English-Medium Models in Meeting the Linguistic Needs of Elementary ELL Students
2021
- 471Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage471
- Downloads252
- Abstract Views219
Artifact Description
Research on an equitable education for English Language Learner (ELL) students shows that ELLs underperform on standardized and grade-level assessments as compared to their non-ELL peers. This specific achievement gap persists when ELLs are taught and assessed in only English— a language they are not yet fully proficient in. In order to close this achievement gap, ELL students should be taught content and language simultaneously by teachers who are all experienced in using English language development strategies, while valuing multilingualism as an asset to learning. English-medium schools attempt to meet this goal through the English Language Development (ELD) program models of Pull-out, Push-in, or Co-teaching. However, the specific academic needs of ELLs remain holistically unmet, as they continue to face inequities in accessing all grade-level content in meaningful ways. To understand how to better meet the linguistic needs of ELLs within this setting, the research question of this study is: Which existing English-medium ELL program model (Pull-out, Push-in, Co-teaching) is most effective in meeting the linguistic needs of elementary ELL students, and how can these models be more successful? More quantitative research is still needed to determine the effects of English-medium models on ELL student success. However, the review of literature indicates that each of these models has strong advantages and disadvantages to closing the achievement gap for ELLs. Therefore, the guide designed as the culminating project of this study focuses on utilizing the advantages found within each of the three models within any ELD program. ELL teachers can use this guide to collaborate with mainstream teachers and school administrators to take a holistic, school-wide approach to meeting the academic needs of ELLs. This guide will benefit schools by providing research and strategies for implementing the advantages of all English-medium models, despite a lack of existing research on the topic. The goal of this study is for all educators that serve ELLs to be empowered to meet their unique academic needs within any ELD program model, and for ELL students to experience increased language and academic growth as a result.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know