Determining the Effectiveness of Low-Dose Computerized Tomography Screenings in Detecting Early Stage Lung Cancer
2016
- 39Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage39
- Abstract Views39
Artifact Description
Historically, most lung cancers were detected at late stages (30% are stage III and 40% are stage IV). Trials were conducted testing the viability of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for nodule detection. The US Preventive Services Task Force identified guidelines for advising LDCT screening based on the National Lung Screening Trial. It was determined that those with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who have quit within 15 years, and are between 55 and 74 years old are at highest risk for lung cancer and therefore benefit most from LDCT screening. Furthermore, a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality has been reported when properly implementing LDCT screening guidelines. Unfortunately, patients were not often receiving treatment within the recommended 14 week window. Delays were most commonly seen in obtaining a CT scan or awaiting biopsy or surgery. Therefore, it is important to establish efficient methods to deliver CT scans, biopsies and surgeries to patients. A retrospective study was performed to identify the effectiveness of a comprehensive lung nodule committee in a community setting for determining early stage lung cancers and ensuring timeliness of care between suspicion and treatment.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know