Gravitational Lensing with Generative Adversarial Networks
2020
- 54Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage54
- Abstract Views54
Artifact Description
We present a new method to simulate gravitational lensing using model-assisted generative adversarial networks (MAGAN) developed by Alonso-Monsalve and Whitehead (2018). The MAGAN is trained to emulate Lenstronomy simulations created by Birrer et. al (2015). The network model is used to save time in generating large datasets of gravitational lensing. MAGANs are neural networks with parameter inputs to target specific features that the network should generate. Our research shows the feasibility of this method and an analysis of the accuracy of our MAGAN after certain training steps, comparing its training and run time to Lenstronomy. The majority of our training time is spent simulating images in order to train the neural network, and lies in the ray tracing step of the Lenstronomy package, placing a bottleneck on accuracy with lower training iterations possible in a given amount of time. The trade-off in training time does result in progressively more accurate images produced by the MAGAN, and at a faster runtime than Lesntronomy.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know