Use of Data Analytics to Spot Educational Discrimination – A Focus on Standardized Testing and Selective Enrollment Schools
2021
- 213Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage213
- Abstract Views213
Artifact Description
We utilized data analytics to investigate potential inequitable practices and policies within the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) system that may negatively affect underrepresented and disadvantaged students. We analyzed large datasets to determine if CPS policies and practices contribute to low standardized testing performance across different schools in the district. We focused on factors that contribute to school rankings, standardized testing, and admissions within selective enrollment schools. We compiled, organized, and analyzed school performance and census tract datasets acquired through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. We compared individual schools’ standardized testing growth rates to other district schools’ rates and national average growth rates. Low student performance is more common among students from low socioeconomic backgrounds, students of color, and students with disabilities. We also investigated equity concerns regarding CPS’s tier system used to determine admissions to selective enrollment schools and have found flaws in the method used to calculate tiers, suggesting that a better model can be constructed. Our results highlight several areas of concern involving standardized testing results across multiple schools in the district. Ultimately, we have identified large numbers of schools with data anomalies that raise concerns and call attention to the need for reform in CPS.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know