Designing a multi-material nerve graft utilizing novel biofabrication techniques to promote peripheral nerve regeneration in injuries greater than 5.0 centimeters in length
2021
- 33Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage33
- Abstract Views33
Artifact Description
Over 20 million people in the United States have peripheral nerve injuries, which result in approximately $150 billion spent in annual health-care dollars in the United States. For those living with peripheral nerve injuries spanning over 5 centimeters, treatment options can be especially elusive. With a nine-month literature review spanning hundreds of journal articles as well as interviews with multiple experts, a novel theoretical peripheral nerve conduit was designed. Market requirements for an optimal nerve conduit include that it must promote neural regeneration, be surgically friendly, have a broad availability in a consistent form, be biocompatible, and eliminate donor site pain. Based upon the literature review and expert interviews, the following design inputs were established. Outer material of the conduit would be comprised of polycaprolactone (PCL), extruded through a 3-D printer into a scaffold. PCL is biodegradable and has been demonstrated to not trigger an immune response in the body. The unique nanostructure of the conduit would contribute to its high porosity; elevated porosity has been shown to promote cell adhesion, viability, and proliferation. Graphene would comprise the inner layer of the conduit, as it’s highly electroconductive properties are conducive to better neural cell communication and has demonstrated biocompatibility.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know