Modifying Bent Functions to Obtain the Balanced Ones with High Nonlinearity
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 13774 LNCS, Page: 449-470
2022
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Balanced Boolean functions with high nonlinearity are considered as major cryptographic primitives in the design of symmetric key cryptosystems. Dobbertin, in early nineties, gave an explicit construction for balanced functions on (even) n variables, with nonlinearity 2n-1-2n2+nlb(n2), where nlb(t) is the maximum nonlinearity of a balanced Boolean functions in t variables and conjectured that nlb(n)≤2n-1-2n2+nlb(n2). This bound still holds. In this paper we revisit the problem. First we present a detailed combinatorial analysis related to highly nonlinear balanced functions exploiting the inter-related properties like weight, nonlinearity, and Walsh–Hadamard spectrum. Our results provide a general framework to cover the works of Sarkar-Maitra (Crypto 2000), Maity-Johansson (Indocrypt 2002), and Maity-Maitra (FSE 2004) as special cases. In this regard, we revisit the well-known construction methods through modification of bent functions and provide supporting examples for 8, 10, 12, and 14 variables. We believe these results will advance the understanding related to highly nonlinear balanced Boolean functions on even numbers of variables as well as the Dobbertin’s conjecture.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85147856453&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22912-1_20; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-22912-1_20; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/conf-articles/413; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1412&context=conf-articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22912-1_20; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-22912-1_20
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know