GMSRF-Net: An Improved generalizability with Global Multi-Scale Residual Fusion Network for Polyp Segmentation
Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ISSN: 1051-4651, Vol: 2022-August, Page: 4321-4327
2022
- 17Citations
- 1Usage
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Conference Paper Description
Colonoscopy is a gold standard procedure but is highly operator-dependent. Efforts have been made to automate the detection and segmentation of polyps, a precancerous precursor, to effectively minimize missed rate. Widely used computer-aided polyp segmentation systems actuated by encoder-decoder have achieved high performance in terms of accuracy. However, polyp segmentation datasets collected from varied centers can follow different imaging protocols leading to difference in data distribution. As a result, most methods suffer from performance drop when trained and tested on different distributions and therefore, require re-training for each specific dataset. We address this generalizability issue by proposing a global multi-scale residual fusion network (GMSRF-Net). Our proposed network maintains high-resolution representations by performing multi-scale fusion operations across all resolution scales through dense connections while preserving low-level information. To further leverage scale information, we design cross multi-scale attention (CMSA) module that uses multi-scale features to identify, keep, and propagate informative features. Additionally, we introduce multi-scale feature selection (MSFS) modules to perform channel-wise attention that gates irrelevant features gathered through global multi-scale fusion within the GMSRF-Net. The repeated fusion operations gated by CMSA and MSFS demonstrate improved generalizability of our network.Experiments conducted on two different polyp segmentation datasets show that our proposed GMSRF-Net outperforms the previous top-performing state-of-the-art method by 8.34% and 10.31% on unseen CVC-ClinicDB and on unseen Kvasir-SEG, in terms of dice coefficient. Additionally, when tested on unseen CVC-ColonDB, we surpass the state-of-the-art method by 9.38% and 4.04% in terms of dice coefficient, when source dataset is Kvasir-SEG and CVC-ClinicDB, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132703710&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icpr56361.2022.9956726; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9956726/; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/conf-articles/476; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1475&context=conf-articles
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know