Non-optimal is Good! Resource Allocation in Presence of Dynamic Obstacles in D2D Networks
Proceedings - Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN, Page: 1-7
2023
- 1Citations
- 1Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
To cope with high bandwidth demands of modern applications, device-to-device (D2D) communications using millimeter-wave (mmWave) signals are being harnessed. The major challenge of mmWave signals is that they require a strict, obstacle-free line-of-sight communication. Static obstacles are easier to avoid; dynamic obstacles pose the main hurdle, their movement not being known. In this work, we propose a way to learn link blockages due to dynamic obstacles, using the link activation history. For this, one might have to explore non-optimal link activations. This ensures that all links are tried a sufficient number of times, ensuring adequate knowledge about link failures, thus creating an exploration-exploitation dilemma. To this end, we propose a systematic way of exploring such non-optimal channel allocations, so that the number of link failures is minimized. Given the hardness of this problem, we devise a greedy solution, and show its effectiveness over existing strategies through simulations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182918616&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/lcn58197.2023.10223393; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10223393/; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/conf-articles/533; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1532&context=conf-articles
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know