Erratum to ``JCLMM: A finite mixture model for clustering of circular-linear data and its application to psoriatic plaque segmentation'' [Pattern Recognition 66 (2017) 160-173]
Pattern Recognition, ISSN: 0031-3203, Vol: 77, Page: 464
2018
- 1Usage
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures5
- Readers5
Correction Description
When this paper was first published, there was an error in Table 2. The correct Table 2 is printed below: ApproachesMethodRecallPrecisionDiceSpecificitySSClustering based approachesFCM(LUV)0.8113 >0.8580 =0.8057>0.8285 >0.7283 >FCM(UV)0.8365 >0.8685 =0.8168 >0.8220 >0.7412 >GMM(LUV)0.8789 =0.8704 =0.8381 =0.8871 =0.7930 =GMM(UV)0.8693 =0.8788 =0.8406 =0.8824 =0.7946 =SWGMM(LCH)0.8977 =0.8631 =0.8620 >0.8603 >0.7889 >SWGMM(HC)0.8984 =0.8619 =0.8593 =0.8702 >0.7944 >JSEG0.9145 >0.8687 =0.8710 =0.8907 =0.8124 =Mean-shift0.7829 >0.9106 <0.8354 =0.9080 =0.8125 =Contour detection approachLS-CV0.8109 >0.8830 =0.8052 >0.8244 >0.7157 >Supervised approachesKNN0.8282 =0.8860 =0.8505 =0.8249 >0.7280 >SVM0.9016 =0.9010 =0.8763 =0.7818 >0.7490 >RF0.8965 =0.9015 =0.8536 =0.7919 >0.7415 >ProposedJCLMM0.90410.88170.87970.88550.8180approachJCLMM-MF0.89980.93840.90420.90280.8289 The publisher regrets any inconvenience caused.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031320318300013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040465027&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0031320318300013; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0031320318300013?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0031320318300013?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/journal-articles/1407; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3161&context=journal-articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.001
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know