Life cycle assessment of industrial scale production of spirulina tablets
Algal Research, ISSN: 2211-9264, Vol: 34, Page: 154-163
2018
- 67Citations
- 5Usage
- 229Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations67
- Citation Indexes64
- 64
- CrossRef4
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
- Captures229
- Readers229
- 229
Article Description
Spirulina platensis has been successfully commercialized as functional food ingredients, animal feed and medicine due to its high contents of protein, beta-carotene, vitamins, and minerals. In this study, we investigated the environmental performance (cradle-to-gate) of edible Spirulina tablets using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). A comparative analysis with other three traditional foods or diets was conducted by using various nutrient values as functional units (e.g., protein content and a composite nutrient score) in the analysis. This research showed that Spirulina tablets production for protein caused environmental impacts mainly in fossil fuel use, acidification, climate change, smog formation, and eutrophication. The impact of the cultivation stage was the highest environmental impacts among all production stages resulting from the extensive use of chemicals, nutrients, and energy. The impacts of algae food production are around 2–5 times to algae production for biofuels which was also modeled in this study. In terms of protein production, algae tablet cause higher impacts than traditional terrestrial crops but lower impacts than protein from animal products. However, as the algae contain a wide variety of nutrients, especially high micronutrients such as the beta-carotene, the environmental impacts of producing the same nutrient combinations of protein and beta-carotene from carrot + tofu were higher than producing Spirulina tablets. The results in this work can be used to assess edible algae production inventories and provide reliable information for development of more sustainable products and processes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211926418300924; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2018.07.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050350112&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211926418300924; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2211926418300924?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2211926418300924?httpAccept=text/plain; https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/keanpublications/1465; https://digitalcommons.kean.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2464&context=keanpublications; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2018.07.013
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know