Setting Up a Study to Investigate the Impact of Removal of Understory Species on the Soil Bacterial Microbiome of a Longleaf Pine Restoration Site
2021
- 205Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage205
- Abstract Views112
- Downloads93
Interview Description
The longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem is one of the most diverse ecosystems on the planet. For thousands of years, this ecosystem was maintained by fires, and its historic land cover spread from the Carolinas all the way to eastern Texas and down through Florida. Today, only 3% of the ecosystem remains, and only 0.01% of that is untouched land. This is largely due to fire suppression and heavy harvesting of these trees. Restoration of the longleaf ecosystem has been of interest because of its economic importance and high ecological diversity. In this study, we propose to investigate the effect of the removal of two grass species on the soil bacterial microbiome of the longleaf pine in a restoration site located in the Piedmont region of Georgia. These two grasses are thought to have major effects on the overall maintenance of the ecosystem because they contribute to the spread of forest fires. This helps to clear the understory and makes it possible for longleaf pines to dominate the savannah. We have surveyed the vegetation and set up six randomized blocks. Within each block, we will have four subplots with the following treatments: 1) control; 2) dominant grass removal; 3) second most dominant grass removal; 4) soil disturbance with no grass species removal. We will present our methodology to study the effect of the removal of the two grass species on the bacterial community of the area under restoration. We expect that results from this project will provide baseline data to help inform and improve restoration practices for the longleaf pine.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know