Abstract state machines and the inquiry process
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 0302-9743, Vol: 6300 LNCS, Page: 405-413
2010
- 2Usage
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures4
- Readers4
Conference Paper Description
Abstract State Machines have long played a valuable role as a catalyst for inquiry into software problems. In the ASM literature, however, there is a tendency to omit reflection on the process of ASM-based design and analysis, focusing instead on final, complete ASM products. As educators, we believe it is important to expose our students to a full, explicit process of inquiry, using ASMs as a vehicle to motivate active questioning. We report on our experiences in bringing ASM-based inquiry to the classroom. A course plan that combines ASMs and Problem Frames has proved effective in eliciting critical inquiry among students. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77956593477&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19; https://digitalcommons.kettering.edu/computerscience_facultypubs/12; https://digitalcommons.kettering.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=computerscience_facultypubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-15025-8_19
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know