Leadership to Address Implicit Bias in the Legal Profession
Vol: 62, Issue: 1, Page: 63
2022
- 1,844Usage
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,844
- Downloads1,371
- 1,371
- Abstract Views473
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
Santa Clara Symposium: Lawyers, Leadership, And Change
Symposium, Lawyers, Leadership, and Change: Addressing Challenges and Opportunities in Unprecedented Times, 62 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1-244 (2022): Donald J. Polden (Dean Emeritus, Santa Clara), Introduction, 62 Santa Clara L. Rev. i (2022) Lindsey P. Gustafson (Arkansas-Little Rock), Aric K. Short (Texas A Google Scholar) & Neil W. Hamilton...
Article Description
This Article discusses the problem of implicit bias within the legal profession; why its persistence impedes the work that lawyers do; and the need for leaders to take steps to recognize, understand, and ameliorate it. Implicit biases, also referred to as unconscious biases, are prejudices that people have, but are unaware of their existence. These biases act as mental shortcuts based on known stereotypes and social norms that cause people to make decisions that favor one group to the detriment of another. Even though the United States has laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, religion, gender, and disability, these laws are incapable of confronting the systemic racism perpetuated by implicit bias. A law will not prevent people from reacting to biases that they are unaware they hold. For this reason, leaders cannot lead equitably without first discovering what biases may be influencing their decisions at the sub-conscious level. This Article calls for leaders within the legal profession to educate themselves about implicit bias, discover what implicit biases they harbor on a personal level, take time to ensure that their decisions are not being influenced by such biases, take steps to de-bias, and lead their constituents to do the same.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know