Monitoring of Breathing Activity using Smartphone-acquired Signals
2015
- 1,082Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,082
- Downloads966
- Abstract Views116
Artifact Description
Respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (VT) are two parameters that a breathing monitor should provide. Several techniques have been developed for monitoring these parameters in clinical and research settings. However, as being designed for such settings, they employ specialized devices that are not translated easily to everyday use due to their high costs, need for skilled operators, or limited mobility. Hence, there is still a lack of portable monitoring devices that can noninvasively estimate RR and VT on a daily basis for the general population. Among VT and RR monitoring methods, respiratory acoustical and noncontact optical approaches have provided promising results. Nowadays it is recognized that more information beyond those parameters can be extracted from respiratory sounds via their digital analysis, which in turns involves the classification of their breath phases. Such classification is trivial when using an external reference like airflow/volume from spirometry, but generally this availability cannot be taken for granted outside clinical and research settings. In this dissertation, we explored the feasibility of developing a portable, accurate, and ease-of-use breathing monitoring device based on a smartphone. Smartphones are an enticing option for developing health applications due to their ubiquity, and software and hardware capabilities. First, we tested the reliability of acquiring real tracheal sounds using smartphones. Then, we performed the tracking of RR at each time instant (IRR) and the estimation of VT from the smartphone-acquired tracheal sounds. Next, we estimated these parameters directly on the smartphone via a noncontact optical monitoring approach able to track the temporal variations of the volumetric changes produced while breathing. Finally, we explored the automatic breath-phase classification of smartphone-acquired respiratory sounds directly on a smartphone. The results obtained in this research regarding the acquisition of tracheal sounds via smartphones, the estimation of IRR and VT via acoustical and optical approaches, and the automatic classification of respiratory breath phases directly on the smartphone, would help to provide the basis for developing a portable, easy-to-use, and reliable breathing monitoring system that would expand the monitoring options available on a daily-basis to the general population.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know