BEHAVIORAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES OF OFFICE AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY
Page: 1-268
1982
- 103Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage103
- Abstract Views103
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This field study addressed behavioral and organizational issues related to office automation technology. The objective was to determine if the manner in which office support is designed and managed makes a difference in the job satisfaction and productivity of support personnel. Two underlying philosophies of organization were identified. The "task-oriented" approach applies the scientific management principles of work specialization to office systems. It corresponds to the authoritative management style of McGregor's Theory X or Likert's Systems 1 and 2. The "people-oriented" approach is characterized by job enrichment and greater autonomy for office employees. It corresponds to the participative management style of McGregor's Theory Y or Likert's Systems 3 and 4. The study hypothesized that job satisfaction and productivity would be higher in organizations using the people-oriented approach.^ To test the hypothesis, this study analyzed the management pratices of office support systems among a national sample of 383 organizations. Management style was assessed with the Profile of Organizational Characteristics, completed by one office support manager and four office support personnel. Job satisfaction was measured by the Job Descriptive Index, completed by support personnel. Performance was reported by managers on a specifically designed instrument. Regression and multivariate analysis provided strong support for the hypothesis that satisfaction was higher among support staff in offices using participatory management practices, and provided weak, but positive, support for the productivity hypothesis.^ It was concluded that organizations employing a people-oriented approach to office design and management are likely to have personnel who express higher satisfaction with their jobs and who have maintained a level of productivity at least equivalent to those organizations which have taken a task-oriented, scientific management approach. It is recommended that organizations devote at least as much time analyzing tasks and procedures to be performed by people as they devote to those which are to be automated. ^
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know