Implementation and Application of the Response EAM for HCP Metals
2013
- 502Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage502
- Downloads418
- Abstract Views84
Artifact Description
Atomistic simulations are a powerful tool for the study of materials, especially in the determination of underlying atomistic mechanisms. Molecular dynamics (MD) is an atomistic simulation method that is well suited for a large number of atoms in a system, up to one billion. MD holds sufficient physical rigor while keeping the number of calculations reasonable for modern computational power. In molecular dynamics, a mathematical potential is used to capture the physics of the interaction between two adjacent atoms or molecules. Existing potentials fail to adequately represent the interaction between some materials, such as Magnesium and Titanium, or are based off of non-physics based parameter fitting which suffers from a lack of rigor. For example, the potentials cannot accurately represent electron density distribution and therefore cannot properly replicate elastic constants and surface relaxation in Hexagonal close packed (HCP) materials and some Face centered Cubic Materials (FCC). In this work, we first review the past 30 years of progress in atomistic simulation, more specifically molecular dynamics, discuss the issues with the existing interatomic potentials, and then establish the need for a new response interatomic potential, or the R-EAM. The R-EAM is based on an approximate form of quantum mechanics theory and is an extension of the existing Embedded Atom Model (EAM) potential. Further, we go on to show simulations to confirm the R-EAM by examining dislocation motion in Magnesium nanorods under tension. The ̅ ̅ dislocation (10-12)[10-11] is found in the HCP material, Magnesium, in accordance with experiments. Further implementation of R-EAM should allow for great expansion of molecular vii dynamics because of its increased accuracy in reproducing surface relaxation and dislocation dynamics for HCP and FCC metals.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know